top of page

Acerca de

Rhetorical Judgment
of  Peers

In-Class Writing Sample #1

         Yours Truly, Priscilla Laguna, judges Mark Oregel’s "Is The Best Writing, Re-Writing?" as needs Improvement, because he did not efface "I" and did not fully adhere to Dr. Gill's rubric. His speechifying was clear and concise.

 

         Yours Truly, Priscilla Laguna, judges Ethan Palisoc's "Steps To Become An Ultimate Writer" as satisfying, because he applied Dr. Gill's rubric, used additional research as well as personal experience to provide evidence. However his speechifying could be improved by speaking louder and using emphasis.

         

         Yours Truly, Priscilla Laguna, judges Andrea Colin-Contreras' "Rewriting In Advance Composition" as needs improvement because although Andrea uses inflection for speechifying and follows Dr Gill's rubric, she did not efface "I", use of personal pronouns and had a couple of grammatical errors such as vague pronoun reference and awkward sentence structure.

 

         Yours Truly, Priscilla Laguna, judges Jasmine Leon's "Use Your Time Wisely And It Will Pay Off" as satisfying, because she followed the structure of Dr Gill's rubric, but she did not efface “I” and had a couple of grammatical errors. Jasmine speechifying was clear and loud.

 

         Yours Truly, Priscilla Laguna, judges Kennedy New's "Advancing English Prose" as outstanding because she has developed her linguistic facility and voice as a writer providing clarity and engaging the readers' interest.

Let’s Work Together...

bottom of page